California Labor Lawyers Harris & Kaufman
 
Home | About Us | Class Action Victories| Law Firm News| Resources | Email Us | TOLL FREE 1-818-990-1999
 


PRACTICE AREAS

  Overtime Pay
  Tip Pooling
  Commission Wages
  Employee Status
  Vacation Pay
  Arbitration
  Wrongful Termination
  Rest & Meal Breaks
  Sexual Harassment
  Disability Discrimination
  Pregnancy Discrimination
  National Origin
  Sexual Orientation
  Racial Discrimination
  Workplace Discrimination
   
 

PROFESSIONS

  EMT's & Paramedics
  Computer Professionals
   
 

ARTICLES

  Articles Overview
  ADA Leave
  Advice on Harassment
  Arbitration Attorney
  Los Angeles Lawyers
  Labor Laws
  FMLA & CFRA Leave
  FMLA & CFRA Rights
  Labor Commissioner
  Overtime Pay Exemption
  Salaried Employee Definition
  Salaried Employees
  Sales Commission Guide
  Sue Directly in Court
  Overtime Pay
   
 

RESOURCES

  FAQS
  Attorney Law Firms
  Email Us
  Disclaimer
   

 


California Class Action Victories



California Court of Appeal declares Circuit City's Arbitration Agreement Unenforceable


A good example of an unfair arbitration agreement is discussed in the decision of Gonlugar v. Circuit City Stores, Inc. Harris & Kaufman represents the plaintiff against Circuit City in an overtime pay class action. In September 2004, a court of appeal said that Circuit City's arbitration agreement could not be enforced. The court of appeal found that the terms of Circuit City's arbitration agreement were so one-side that it "shocked the conscience". Among the things, Circuit City's arbitration agreement bound only the employee to arbitration, required the employee to pay fees to Circuit City just for initiating the arbitration (Circuit City pays no such fees), imposes a shortened statute of limitation on the employee (and not on Circuit City), and prohibits class actions. The court concluded that the "central purpose of the agreement" was "tainted with illegality". Click Here to read the entire text.

Red Lobster Restaurant Arbitration


On June 10, 2005, an arbitrator employed by the American Arbitration Association ruled in favor of Harris & Kaufman's client, Jogesh Sidhu. To read the decision, click here. Mr. Sidhu brought a lawsuit against GMRI, Inc., and Darden Restaurants, Inc., the owners and operators of the Red Lobster Restaurant chain. The defendant's successfully enforced the company's arbitration agreement and then argued that the arbitration agreement precluded class arbitration. The matter then went before the arbitrator who ruled in favor of Mr. Sidhu. This case was one of the first of kind and one of the first to go through the American Arbitration Association's "Clause Construction" procedures put in effect after the United States Supreme Court's decision of Green Tree Financial Corp. v. Bazzle. This decision does not represent the ultimate victory in the case, but it is a substantial step forward.

Harris & Kaufman Can Help You


HARRIS AND KAUFMAN IS A CALIFORNIA law firm that's dedicated to representing employees in disputes against their employers to do with arbitration in the State of California. Our lawyers can assist you if you believe that your employer has broken the California Labor Law.

Our employment attorneys are experienced and have had numerous trials, arbitrations, and appeals and have litigated on behalf of thousands of employees.

Harris & Kaufman has represented workers in state and federal court and in administrative proceedings before the California Labor Commissioner. Determined and aggressive, our cases include individual disputes and class action lawsuits. Based in Sherman Oaks, California we serve greater Los Angeles, Orange County, Ventura County and have cases statewide.

Think you have a claim? Email Here

© Copyright 2008 Harriskaufman.com All rights reserved.